Its pro evaluations and pointers publication editors within decisions and you may guarantee that wrote scientific studies are appropriate, strict, and you can credible. Editors pick peer reviewers simply because of the into the-depth expertise in the niche count or types of the job he or she is requested to check on. It expertise is actually invaluable and irreplaceable. Fellow writers was responsible for the accuracy and views shown within the their profile, while the peer remark techniques operates on a principle regarding mutual trust ranging from article writers, writers and you will writers. Even after fast advances, generative AI products provides big limits: capable lack upwards-to-day degree and will write nonsensical, biased otherwise untrue suggestions. Manuscripts may also tend to be painful and sensitive or exclusive suggestions which will not become shared beyond your peer feedback procedure. For these reasons we query that, when you find yourself Springer Characteristics explores providing all of our peer writers that have entry to safe AI systems, fellow reviewers dont publish manuscripts on the generative AI devices.
If any area of the investigations of your own claims built in brand new manuscript was a student in any way backed by an enthusiastic AI unit, we inquire fellow writers to claim the aid of such as equipment transparently on fellow feedback report.
Citations
Browse articles and you can non-research articles (e.grams. View, Comment, and you will Reviews posts) need certainly to mention suitable and you will associated literature to get the newest claims produced. Continuously worry about-violation, matched jobs one of several people so you’re able to along care about-mention, gratuitous and you will unnecessary ticket away from stuff composed in the log to which the papers could have been submitted, and any other types of ticket manipulation is actually poor.
Citation manipulation can lead to the content becoming denied, and may end up being said so you’re able to authors’ organizations. Similarly, any initiatives of the fellow-reviewers or publishers to help you remind such methods is going to be stated because of the people into copywriter.
- Experts should think about the following advice while preparing its manuscript:
- People declaration regarding manuscript one to depends on additional sources of recommendations (we.elizabeth. maybe not the fresh authors’ individual the latest facts or results or standard knowledge) is always to use a citation.
- Writers would be to avoid mentioning derivations away from amazing work. Particularly, they want to mention the original works in the place of an assessment blog post one alludes to an original work.
- People will be guarantee that the citations are direct (i.elizabeth. they should ensure the violation supporting the report made in their manuscript and cannot misrepresent a separate functions by citing it if the it generally does not keep the part the latest experts wish to build).
- People shouldn’t cite supply they’ve not realize.
- People must not preferentially cite their or their friends’, peers’, or institution’s books.
- Authors would be to stop pointing out work only from one country.
- Experts should not use a way too high level of citations to support one point.
- Essentially, experts should cite sources with experienced peer review where you can.
- Authors must not mention ads otherwise advertorial procedure.
Preprint revealing and you may violation
BMC journals remind send out-of preprints regarding first lookup manuscripts for the preprint host of your own authors’ solutions, authors’ otherwise institutional other sites, and open communications ranging from researchers if into society preprint host otherwise preprint placing comments platforms.
Preprints are identified as an author’s brand of research manuscript before certified peer remark during the a journal, which is transferred toward a community host (just like the demonstrated in Preprints towards lifestyle sciences. Technology 352, 899901; 2016); preprints are printed when within the peer feedback process. Posting out-of preprints is not felt past publication and will not threaten said from the BMC magazines. Manuscripts posted into the preprint server won’t be taken into account when deciding the advance provided with a survey in question during the a great BMC diary.
BMC have married which have Lookup Square ( BMC features a majority need for Search Square) to include Into the Review, a journal-incorporated service for preprint discussing, supporting authors round the all of the organizations i serve to express its lookup very early. Article writers submitting for some BMC guides will be able to in public share facts about the fellow comment because of Within the Opinion. General details about In Review at the BMC while the Search Rectangular preprint program is present right here that’s where .